Space

‘Star Trek: Voyager’ at 30: Why it was the right show at the wrong time

‘Star Trek: Voyager’ at 30: Why it was the right show at the wrong time


After seven years making it so on the small screen, the Next Generation crew graduated to full-on movie star status with 1994’s “Star Trek: Generations“. But as Jean-Luc and co got busy meeting Starfleet royalty (hello, James T Kirk) and smashing the Enterprise into the surface of Veridian III, Paramount had decided they needed a flagship for their new United Paramount Network (UPN). Voyager was the vessel assigned to carry the franchise into a new frontier. It left Spacedock for the first time on January 16, 1995.

Although space station-set stablemate “Deep Space Nine” was carving out a new niche with its increasingly complex story arc, the new show would mark a return to the starship-based spirit of exploration that characterized the original “Star Trek“. Even so, co-creators Rick Berman (the longtime steward of the franchise), Michael Piller, and Jeri Taylor knew they couldn’t simply churn out a “TNG” clone.

Item one on the agenda was being the first “Trek” to put a woman in the captain’s chair — Kate Mulgrew would go on to play Kathryn Janeway through seven seasons and beyond. It was also decided that the new show would make Kirk and Spock’s original five-year mission look like a walk in the park, by marooning the Voyager crew on the other side of the galaxy, roughly 75 years from home. And they’d inject some tension into the traditionally utopian environment of a Starfleet bridge by forcing the crew to cohabit with a group of terrorists.

Star Trek: Voyager

(Image credit: Paramount)

It was such a brilliant premise that it should have put an exciting new spin on “Star Trek”‘s decades-old mission to explore strange new worlds. As it turned out, however, the gravitational pull of familiar “Trek” tropes proved too great, and within a few short weeks, the show’s faraway location and thrown-together crew would feel like afterthoughts. In hindsight, the world — and “Star Trek” as a whole — may not have been ready for what “Voyager” originally set out to do.

Article by:Source –

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

To Top
Follow Us