Space

Donna Elbert and the Table on Page 208 – Sky & Telescope

Posted on


Portrait of Elbert taken in 1952 by William Morgan, then a researcher at Yerkes Observatory, later a director.
Photo courtesy of Susan Steele

For a postdoctoral fellowship at UCLA, Susanne Horn returned to the book long regarded as a foundation of her science, fluid dynamics. On page 208, the mystery lay in plain sight. Horn aimed to crack it.

In the book, Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability, published in 1961, legendary astrophysicist Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar made a bold mathematical case that fluid dynamics could reveal the universe. But for the breakthrough on page 208, the author gave all the credit to his computer.

“The fact that the curve R(a) defined by equations (59) and (60) has two minima for certain ranges of the parameters Q1 and T1 was first observed by Donna Elbert.”

But no one followed up, until Horn nearly fifty years later, and she realized that the table described a key mechanism for a planet to generate a magnetic dynamo — and thus support and protect life. As she prepared to publish on what she named “the Elbert range,” Horn searched for Elbert the mathematician. She found an obituary, from the month before.

Early Days

Donna DeEtte Elbert remembered the summer day when she was nine, and Chandra and his wife came from India to Williams Bay, Wisconsin. She felt sad they were far from home, but she soon she thought of them as much a part of the scenery as the nearby Yerkes Observatory where Chandra worked.

In this photo taken in the late 1930s or early 1940s, Elbert stands in the middle of her brothers William (left) and Phil (right) at their home in Williams Bay, Wisconsin.
Photo courtesy of Susan Steele

The only daughter of the only barber in town, the popular, artistic Donna sewed her own clothes and dreamed of studying fashion. But tuition was out of reach, and her little brother Phil teased that girls didn’t go to college. She worked in Milwaukee for a while, then her father said Chandra, in for a haircut, mentioned he had a job to fill.

The interior of William Elbert’s barbershop in Williams Bay, Wisconsin.
Photo courtesy of M. Joanne Kantner

Born in 1910 in Madras, first son of his Brahmin family, and a math prodigy, Chandra earned a place at Cambridge at 19 years old. He passed the lonely sea voyage to England by calculating a critical threshold in the evolution of a star as it exhausts its fuel.

Six years later, Chandra joined the University of Chicago at its Yerkes Observatory, 100 miles northwest of the main campus. He had been there a decade when he hired Elbert, who found him kind and polite, honest and direct, and, at 38, incredibly old.

Elbert in a bridesmaid’s gown that she made, in a photo likely taken in the late 1940s. Eventually, after working for decades as a technical assistant, Elbert obtained a degree in fine arts.
Photo courtesy of Susan Steele

Her official title was technical assistant, but the informal term was “computer.” Processing data at an American observatory was one of the few science jobs available to women from the mid-19th century to the 1960s. Elbert handled Chandra’s correspondence and his students, but her biggest task was double-checking his math on a Marchant mechanical calculator. She liked the work, and she was good at it.

He told biographer Kameshwar C. Wali, “The fact that she was there and could do such work meant I could carry on the work until it was aesthetically complete and not merely complete as far as in the kind of information I wanted.”

Theoretical physicist Marvin Goldberger also told Wali, “I used to accuse Chandra of chaining her into a closet and making her carry out his horrendous calculations.”, and Uranus — even Jupiter’s moon Ganymede — also register in the Elbert range, meaning these worlds support global magnetic fields. At least, Horn argued, Elbert gave astrophysics a better tool when hunting for planets where life might spring.

“She clearly did not just type a number. She quite often also simplified the equations from Chandrasekhar,” Horn said. “She understood what she was doing and was not just a calculator. She’s completely self-taught, in a sense. So, yes, she got the support from Chandrasekhar, but clearly she was extremely smart to do this.”

Elbert enjoyed a long, pleasant retirement in Williams Bay. She died on January 15, 2019, a week shy of 91. One month later, Susanne Horn read her obituary.

Elbert and her grandmother around 1957 outside the family home. Elbert cared for her parents and grandparents while she worked as Chandra’s computer.
Photo courtesy of Susan Steele

In August 2022, Horn’s paper, “The Elbert range of magnetostrophic convection. I. Linear theory,” was published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society A. She plans two more papers about the science in the table on page 208. But she also has found that Elbert’s life story resonates, especially with women scientists, and they now are paying tribute to the self-taught mathematician from small-town Wisconsin.

Noted California astronomer Virginia Trimble has long sponsored a student workshop at Lick Observatory, and she named the May 2024 event for Elbert. Three months later, Czech geographic researcher Alexandra Guy published a paper naming a feature in Antarctica the Elbert magnetic anomaly.

“People were not aware of her, even though everyone had somehow come across this name,” Horn said. “She was always the footnote in all the papers. Everyone always thinks, oh, the only smart person on this paper is Chandrasekhar. But she actually did a lot. These computations, they are not that easy.”


Anne Saker, a career daily journalist, was a member of the Cincinnati Enquirer team that earned the 2018 Pulitzer Prize in local reporting. She is in the Hall of Fame of the Greater Cincinnati Society of Professional Journalists. Email: [email protected]

Article by:Source: Anne Saker

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

Exit mobile version