Business & Economy
Larsen & Toubro shares rise 3% after securing major steel project in Middle East & North Africa
The company has a history of executing large-scale iron and steel manufacturing projects worldwide, and this latest order would require L&T’s capabilities in delivering complex design-build steel plants, the company said. L&T’s M&M vertical provides end-to-end solutions across mining, minerals processing, industrial products, and metallurgical plants.
Also read | Time to buy the dip? Stock market indicates oversold level
The stock’s rebound comes after a weak session on Monday when L&T fell over 4% in reaction to the Union Budget’s marginal increase in capital expenditure (capex) allocation. Investors were disappointed with the government’s decision to budget Rs 11.2 lakh crore for FY26 capex, only slightly above the Rs 11.1 lakh crore in FY25.
The reduced emphasis on capex-led growth led to declines in infrastructure stocks, including L&T, Siemens, and IRB Infra, which fell up to 7% amid brokerage downgrades.
Brokerage firm Motilal Oswal noted that with the pace of capex growth slowing from 30% in FY21-24 to just 10% for FY26, the industrial sector may struggle to sustain order inflows at previous levels. Analysts are now favoring capital goods companies with diversified revenue streams beyond government contracts.
L&T recently reported strong Q3 earnings, with net profit rising 14% year-on-year to Rs 3,359 crore, while revenue grew 17% to Rs 64,668 crore. However, cost pressures dragged EBITDA margins down by 70 basis points to 9.7%. Despite this, the company secured Rs 1,16,036 crore in orders during the quarter, a 53% jump from the previous year, signaling a potential turnaround from sluggish first-half performance.
Over the past six months, L&T shares have declined 7.3%, while the stock has fallen 1.7% in the last week.
Also read | Gold, silver, Bitcoin may crash as Trump tariffs loom, warns Rich Dad, Poor Dad author Robert Kiyosaki
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
Article by:Source: